Updated 7 October 2026
Upload a PDF or Word resume. In about 30 seconds, get a 0–100 score of your resume's content — results, clarity, keywords — plus the keywords missing for the job you paste. 3 checks a day. No account.
Drag your resume here or click to upload
PDF, Word (.docx) or TXT — max 5MBText is extracted in your browser and sent for scoring. We do not sell resumes. Delete via hola@getcvpro.com. Privacy & terms
This check also works in Spanish — try the Spanish version of this tool.
Reading your resume the way a recruiter would...
💡 Many mid-size and large employers filter resumes before a person opens the file.
more recommendations + a professional AI rewrite
🎯 What job are you targeting?
A model scores the extracted text against a fixed rubric; it does not connect to Greenhouse, Workday or Taleo. Before that happens, the text you uploaded is flattened into a single run of plain text — line breaks and spacing are collapsed, so the model never sees columns, tables or where something sat on the page. It can only judge what made it into that flattened text, not your layout.
| What it checks | What fails the check |
|---|---|
| Generic clichés | Stock adjectives with nothing backing them — "responsible," "proactive," "committed" — instead of what you actually did. |
| First-person phrasing | "I managed...", "I was responsible for..." instead of direct, resume-style phrasing. |
| Missing numbers and results | Duties listed with no outcome attached — no amount, no percentage, no count, no timeframe. |
| Job keywords | Little or no overlap with the terms used in postings for your field, or with the job description you pasted. |
| Confusing structure | Sections, dates or responsibilities that are hard to follow even once the text is flattened and in front of the model. |
This is a different question from whether the file parses at all — a two-column layout or a scanned image can keep your text from being extracted in the first place, before any of the above ever gets evaluated. That failure mode is covered next.
This shows how to fix the formatting mistakes from the list above before you upload a file. The tool's actual report covers the content criteria from "What the score measures" instead — it does not grade the formatting shown here.
Based on the cashier resume used in CVPro's own examples. The name, email and employers below are made up for this illustration; no real candidate's data is shown.
✉ jm.cashier88@email.com 📱 555-0199 📍 Tucson, AZTwo-column body
Cashier — QuickMart, 2021 – Present ✦ Responsible for the cash register. ✦ Handled money. ✦ Rang up customers. Cashier — Family Store, 03/2023 – 11/2023 ✦ Was in charge of the sales counter. ✦ Did returns.
J.M. — Cashier jm.cashier88@email.com · 555-0199 · Tucson, AZ Work Experience Cashier — QuickMart, 2021 – Present - Responsible for the cash register. - Handled money. - Rang up customers. Cashier — Family Store, Mar 2023 – Nov 2023 - Was in charge of the sales counter. - Did returns. Skills Cash handling, point-of-sale systems, customer service
Issues found in this example
The two-column block was merged into one column, the header became part of the body text, "My Journey" was renamed "Work Experience" — the section label the system looks for — and the decorative ✦ symbols were replaced with plain hyphens. The job titles and employers were kept exactly as given, and the dates keep the same months and years in a consistent written format (03/2023 → Mar 2023): no new month, payment method or other detail was added that was not already in the original. Only these four formatting issues were fixed. Turning duties into measurable results is a separate, honest step, not something to pad in afterward.
Paid prices and caps for other tools as reported in public reviews, July–October 2026. Check their sites.
| CVPro | Jobscan | Resume Worded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signup to see a score | No | Yes | Yes |
| Free cap | 3/day | about 5/month on the free tier reported in 2026 reviews | limited preview |
| Match to a pasted job | Yes, on this page | Yes, core feature | partial |
| Connects to an employer ATS | No | No | No |
| Paid model | one-time from $4.99 | subscription | subscription |
| Invented achievements | blocked by a verifier on the paid rewrite | n/a | n/a |
This is worth stating plainly: no tool can guarantee a resume will pass every ATS. Each employer configures theirs with its own criteria, and some do not use one at all. What can be done is removing the known technical obstacles, using your industry's vocabulary, and presenting your experience so a human wants to read it. Any service promising a guaranteed pass rate is selling something it cannot deliver.
If you have been applying without any response, here are the nine real reasons you are not getting callbacks — including the ones that are not about you.
If you also want to review where you are searching, we compare the six real job search channels and which fits each situation, including how to spot fake postings.
No. This is a scoring tool: a model reads your extracted text against a fixed rubric. It does not log in to Greenhouse, Workday, Taleo or any other employer system, and it never sees an employer's account.
No, the text of your resume is not stored. If you ask to have the report emailed to you, we register your email address as a lead at that point. Write to hola@getcvpro.com to request deletion of anything we hold.
The scale is 0 to 100. A high score means the extracted text reads like a strong resume: concrete numbers and results, action-oriented phrasing, your field's keywords, and no generic clichés or first-person lines; a low score usually points to one of those content gaps, not to a lack of experience and not to how the file is formatted — the formatting mistakes above affect whether the text gets extracted at all, not this score. It is this tool's own scale — not Jobscan's match rate or any other service's number.
They use different extractors: PDF text is pulled with pdf.js, reading up to the first 8 pages, while a .docx file is read with mammoth, which has no page limit of its own. Either way, the extracted text is then cut to the same 6,000 characters before it is scored, so a .docx resume does not get a longer analysis than a PDF — it only skips pdf.js's 8-page cutoff during extraction. What actually hurts either format is the same: a scanned image, text placed inside images, or a two-column layout. A native, text-based PDF or .docx file works equally well.
3 free checks a day, with no card required.
No. No sign-up and no card to see your score and the issues found.
It sends your uploaded text into CVPro's guided builder in "optimize" mode. A model rewrites it in professional language, and a separate, deterministic verifier then checks every line against what you actually provided — it does not add employers, titles or achievements you did not state.
No. A higher score here means your resume's content is stronger — clear results, no clichés, the right keywords — not that any system finds it more readable. Whether you get an interview still depends on your experience, the job market and the person who reads it. No tool can guarantee a pass through every employer's ATS or a callback.
Write to hola@getcvpro.com. The resume text itself is not stored; if you had requested the report by email, that is the email address we delete on request.
If you also want to see how a resume in your field is structured, we have 60 examples with a guide on what recruiters check in each profession, the mistakes that get candidates rejected, and sector keywords: